<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Buzzyeah - Latest Comments in Thank You, Radiohead. It&amp;#8217;s About ****ing Time</title><link>http://buzzyeah.disqus.com/</link><description>Trends, technology, and my genome</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 02:38:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thank You, Radiohead. It&amp;#8217;s About ****ing Time</title><link>http://buzzyeah.com/2007/10/31/thank-you-radiohead-its-about-ing-time/#comment-1486684</link><description>i think higher bitrate CDs are king as long as they bring in the major label money. however, as soon as digital downloads (direct from artists) provide a serious business model than their bitrates will go up and audiophiles will be happy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but regardless of bitrates, i will still want to preview music before i shell over money. artists need to figure that into their distribution models (and business models).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Meyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 02:38:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank You, Radiohead. It&amp;#8217;s About ****ing Time</title><link>http://buzzyeah.com/2007/10/31/thank-you-radiohead-its-about-ing-time/#comment-1486686</link><description>well it's not even an issue of paying though, you know?  i mean, i'm sure if fans KNEW a cd release would be available shortly after the (fake) e-drop, 90% of the people who paid would have waited.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tuftsmania</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 01:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank You, Radiohead. It&amp;#8217;s About ****ing Time</title><link>http://buzzyeah.com/2007/10/31/thank-you-radiohead-its-about-ing-time/#comment-1486685</link><description>yeah in the future i will be entering $0.00 when given the choice on these low bitrate Internet downloads. i'm going to use the free low bitrate downloads as previews. if i like them than i might decide to buy the high bitrate, audiophile CDs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Meyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:43:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank You, Radiohead. It&amp;#8217;s About ****ing Time</title><link>http://buzzyeah.com/2007/10/31/thank-you-radiohead-its-about-ing-time/#comment-1486687</link><description>i feel you on the trent reznor, but in my opinion, i think radiohead kind of shafted its fans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i'm not calling myself a fan, because i'm not, but offering us the choice to pay for an album (and a lot of us paying) only to distribute a low bitrate version of the album, then turning around and selling that disgusting box set with whoever the label/distributor is completely shitty.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tuftsmania</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:18:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>