<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>BUZZYEAH - Latest Comments in Make PressDemocrat.com Better, Pt 1: Internet Friendly</title><link>http://buzzyeah.disqus.com/</link><description>Hyped on trends, innovation, and technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:16:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Make PressDemocrat.com Better, Pt 1: Internet Friendly</title><link>http://buzzyeah.com/2008/09/13/make-pressdemocratcom-better-pt-1-internet-friendly/#comment-2411041</link><description>Sara, thanks for providing your input all the way from Austin. I'll definitely be touching on the "local news" part of your comment in Pt 3. You guys keep jumping ahead of me. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">admeyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make PressDemocrat.com Better, Pt 1: Internet Friendly</title><link>http://buzzyeah.com/2008/09/13/make-pressdemocratcom-better-pt-1-internet-friendly/#comment-2410651</link><description>I was saving comments/forum suggestions for Pt 2, which can be found here: &lt;a href="http://buzzyeah.com/2008/09/17/make-pressdemocratcom-better-pt-2-improve-comments-improve-conversations/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://buzzyeah.com/2008/09/17/make-pressdemocr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for what I mean by "real blogs", I don't have a deep, philosophical Web 2.0 babble definition. The blogs just seem clunky like the main site. I guess they both have comments, blogrolls, and recent posts lists; and John Beck's links out of his posts. So, they meet the basics there. I'm just used to the feel and look of excellent blogging platforms like Wordpress. Blogs don't seem Internet friendly to me unless they're using a "real" blogging platform like Wordpress, etc. What platform do you guys use? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do the PD blogs use the same site structure as the main site? Because if they do they aren't Google search friendly. You could probably get way better traffic flow for the blogs using the Wordpress platform.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">admeyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make PressDemocrat.com Better, Pt 1: Internet Friendly</title><link>http://buzzyeah.com/2008/09/13/make-pressdemocratcom-better-pt-1-internet-friendly/#comment-2406928</link><description>I couldn't agree more.  I grew up in Santa Rosa and used to read the PD every day.  I moved to LA a few years ago and now live Austin, and I try to read online.  But, to your points above, it's a chore.  Navigation is horrible, the RSS feeds are just as bad, and when my family members in Windsor mention a current article, I have to do the same search.  I also agree with Nathan's comment below; I've stopped viewing or participating in any aspect of the community/forums/comments because I'm appalled at the level of racism and nastiness some people post on the site.  It's especially disappointing to me because I'd love to be able to feel connected to Sonoma County and read about the local news every day.  I hope they'll make some changes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sara Mariani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:16:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make PressDemocrat.com Better, Pt 1: Internet Friendly</title><link>http://buzzyeah.com/2008/09/13/make-pressdemocratcom-better-pt-1-internet-friendly/#comment-2405472</link><description>Comments/community conversation is part 2. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">admeyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make PressDemocrat.com Better, Pt 1: Internet Friendly</title><link>http://buzzyeah.com/2008/09/13/make-pressdemocratcom-better-pt-1-internet-friendly/#comment-2402941</link><description>You make some strong points. The Press Democrat has a long ways to go. And I'm not just saying that because you advocate for me to have a bigger presence in the publication. ;)&lt;br&gt;The one thing you left out was the need to improve our forums and comments. Right now the comments are often vile attacks against victims, professionals, and way too often minority groups. Very few tools have been given to online readers to help police the forums -- and they don't appear to be effective. In my opinion, our comment section in its current iteration drops the overall value of the online publication.&lt;br&gt;I'd also be interested in hearing you expand on your definition of "real blogs." Because while I don't have a blog, both Beck and Maiocco do. And Maiocco's blog drives HUGE traffic to the Web site. I don't have the exact numbers, but I think it's fair to say his blog contributes a double-digit percentage of traffic. That said, the blogs are fairly basic, text-oriented pages, with few options for us to expand on. What more would you like to see on the blogs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Halverson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:29:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>