-
Website
http://buzzyeah.com/ -
Original page
http://buzzyeah.com/2008/05/04/just-downloaded-a-file-containing-my-raw-genome-data-now-what/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
jaampool
2 comments · 1 points
-
Web Design
4 comments · 1 points
-
Andrew Meyer
85 comments · 4 points
-
benvanderbeek
8 comments · 1 points
-
golfman_story
2 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
oops
I am glad to know my $50 didn't just go for cheeseburgers or something like that. Do I get the file to play with too? Is there some kind of genetic dna file type standard like jpeg or mpeg or whatever so I can get some software to manipulate it with?
Uncle Jim
Eventually, I will want to clone you (with some alterations of course) so do I have any license agreements prepared where we have to give you royalties or anything?
As for cloning, I'm thinking we can just work out some sort of indentured servitude program for a couple of them. I'm not too greedy.
Go to this post and it will tell you how I can share my results with you.
Upload to www.myfamilyhealth.com/health/dna. They would take 24hrs to analyze your SNP data.
Most of all, it is FREE.
Remember to login/create an account to upload the data and then re login to your account to explore the analyzed data sets.
By chance did you upload the data to MyFaimilyHealth.com?
I am just curious to know; what could they do with your Genotype data?
Will that be same or different from 23andMe and DecodeMe results?
"Hi ,
Upload your data here and in a few weeks you can analyse your data usingMyFamilyHealth tools and services for FREE! "
Since the upload also had a text box labeled:
"Please tell us some detail of your data, such as:
i. From where did you acquire this data.
ii. The data format or specification.
iii. Any related details. "
It would seem likely a human (mayhap swswsu) will read that file and do your analysis.
Mike, have you gotten your MyFamilyHealth results back yet?
The UI is a little rough, but functional. Some of the artwork is quite good, but the look&feel of the dynamic elements isn't nearly as pretty. There are several visualizations, a relative risk which does not seem to render for me, a sized/colored ATCG (which seems a poor choice for what I think it wants to convey) as well as a 'visible human' style map which responds to mouse-overs and clicks. The last element is particularly well done, but seems more eye candy than scientific rigor. Notably visualizations in one of the main windows disappears when elements are moved outside the bounding box.
They appear to track 22 medical conditions which are classified as either high or low confidence, and for each there is a red/yellow/green high/med/low risk assignment. These also provide a % risk for european/asian/african populations vs 'my' data. Generally the site does link to pubmed, to backup the claims. I find the lack of an rs# makes it difficult to verify specific claims, but that is partly my bias showing through.
It all seems reasonable enough, but I'm not exactly overwhelmed. In fairness I've got a certain bias due to promethease, which is often similarly criticized.
I'm thinking I'll stick to playing w/ Promethease for now.
Btw: I didn't run across your profile in the community section.